Difference between revisions of "Fine/speciality chemicals"

From Efficiency Finder
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Back to EFFICIENCY FINDER FOR CHEMICAL INDUSTRY '''Competitive technologies and energy saving potentials for the production of polymers''' ''' 1. Use of pow...)
 
m (Changed protection level for "Fine/speciality chemicals" (‎[edit=sysop] (indefinite) ‎[move=sysop] (indefinite)))
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
  
'''Competitive technologies and energy saving potentials for the production of polymers'''
+
'''Process engineering and energy issues for the production of Organic fine chemicals'''
  
  
''' 1. Use of power and steam from cogeneration plants'''
+
;a) Reactors
  
 +
The main equipment in multipurpose plants is the stirred tank reactor, which fulfils the flexibility requirements arising from the varied physical states of the materials being used (e.g. dry powders, wet solids, pastes, liquids, emulsions, gases). The vessels are required to withstand a range of process conditions (e. g. temperature, pressure, corrosion) and are thus usually made of stainless steel, rubber- or glass-lined steel, enamel coated, or other special materials. The mechanical design of the agitator baffles and cooling systems is constrained by the need to attach and maintain the rubber or glass lining.
  
;Description
+
Other characteristics:
  
A typical cogeneration system consists of an engine and a steam turbine, or a combustion turbine that drives an electrical generator. A waste heat exchanger recovers waste heat from the engine and/or exhaust gas to produce hot water or steam. Cogeneration produces a given amount of electric power and process heat with 10 to 30 % less fuel than it takes to produce the electricity and process heat separately. Cogeneration is normally installed when the plant uses the steam produced, or where an outlet for the steam produced is available. The electricity produced can either be used by the plant or exported. [27, TWGComments, 2004]
+
::*used for both batch and continuous mode, as well as in cascades
  
 +
::*sized up to 60 m3 (fermentation reactors up to about 1000 m3)
  
;Achieved environmental benefits
+
::*usually dished bottom (reactions may be carried out under pressure)
  
The overall efficiency of fuel utilisation is increased up to 90 %.
+
::*equipped with one or more stirrers to ensure the requested mixing degree, heat-exchange performance, etc.  
  
 +
::*jackets or half pipe coils are often fitted around the vessel to provide heat transfer
  
;Cross-media effects
+
::*wall baffles are installed inside to prevent the gross rotation (“swirl”) of the contents with the stirrer.
  
By the use of a cogeneration plant, not only are the energy costs reduced, but also the emissions caused by the production of energy.
 
  
 +
[[Image:Stirred tank reactor.jpg]]
  
;Operational data
+
Figure 2: Stirred tank reactor (conventional temperature control, left) and loop reactor (right), BREF on Organic Fine Chemicals, Aug. 2006
  
No further information submitted.
 
  
 +
Other used reactor types are, e.g:
  
;Applicability
+
::*loop reactors (closed loop or continuous loop)
  
The use of a cogeneration system is not only applicable for consumers of a vast amount of energy as the data in Table 1 show.
+
::*bubble columns (closed loop or continuous loop)
  
If required, possible outlets have to be available in the vicinity.
+
::*pipe reactors
  
 +
::*tubular reactors.
  
[[Image:Energy efficiency of cogeneration systems of different size.jpg]]
 
  
Table 1: Energy efficiency of cogeneration systems of different size
+
;b) Energy supply
  
 +
Two main sources of energy are consumed on the typical site:
  
;Economics
+
::*steam
  
No further information submitted.
+
::*electricity.  
  
 +
Generally, only steam is produced on-site and electricity is supplied by an external source. Cogeneration by self-production of electricity and steam is advantageous on large sites. Energy is normally provided by boilers equipped with turbines fitted with burners for natural gas and fuel oil, with gas being the main fuel (about 95%). Spent solvents are often used as a fuel together with gas. Figure 3 shows an example for a setup with two boilers sharing an exhaust gas recuperator. Here the smaller boiler (boiler 1 which produces 80 tonnes steam/hour) is mainly used in summer and the larger boiler (boiler 2 which produces 160 tonnes steam/hour) mainly in winter, when the steam demand is higher. The recuperator cools down the exhaust gas from 130°C to about 45°C and warms the water from 20°C to about 60°C. About 3.8 MW heat is recovered. Steam and electricity can also be provided by on-site combined cycle power plants, thermal oxidisers or incinerators.
  
;Driving force for implementation
 
  
Economic and environmental reasons.
+
[[Image:Example of energy supply setup with two boilers.jpg]]
 +
 
 +
Figure 3: Example of energy supply setup with two boilers, BREF on Organic Fine Chemicals, Aug. 2006
 +
 
 +
 
 +
;c) Energy efficiency
 +
 
 +
''1. Green chemistry:''
  
 +
Concerning the production of chemicals, the principle of green chemistry is to promote the use of alternative synthetic routes and alternative reaction conditions to existing less environmentally friendly processes; i.e. by minimising energy requirements, in recognition of the associated environmental and economic impacts. Reactions at ambient temperatures and pressures should be preferred
  
  
''' 2. Recovery of exothermic reaction heat through generation of low pressure steam'''
+
''2. Enzymatic processes versus chemical processes''
  
  
 
;Description
 
;Description
  
The removed heat of reaction can be used to generate low pressure steam for preheating purposes (e.g. tubular processes, high pressure separators or tubular reactors in LDPE processes), other internal usage or for export to an external user.
+
Using enzymatic processes instead of chemical processes is advantageous from an environmental point of view. Less synthesis steps (no additional modification or protection of functional groups) and low solvent use are the major beneficial effects. Energy savings, fewer safety and disposal issues, and improved product quality also lead to cost benefits. The enzyme can be used in solution or fixed on a substrate, or as part of a polyfunctional enzymatic system, e.g. in living cells, free in a reaction medium or fixed on a substrate.
  
  
 
;Achieved environmental benefits
 
;Achieved environmental benefits
  
Reduction of energy consumption.
+
An example from the manufacture of 6-aminopenicillanic acid is presented in the following table:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Table 1: Comparison of enzymatic and chemical processes. Consumption levels for the conversion of 1000 t Penicillin G, BREF on Organic Fine Chemicals, Aug. 2006
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Comparison of enzymatic and chemical processes.jpg]]
  
  
 
;Cross-media effects
 
;Cross-media effects
  
No cross-media effects known.
+
Higher water consumption.
  
  
 
;Operational data
 
;Operational data
  
No further information submitted.
+
No information provided.
  
  
 
;Applicability
 
;Applicability
  
This technique can be applied in various processes, but is mainly applied in integrated sites where customers for the produced steam are available.
+
The technical feasibility has to be considered individually.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Other examples with environmental advantages are [46, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, 2003]:
 +
 
 +
::*Aspartame
 +
 
 +
::*7-amino cefalosporanic acid
 +
 
 +
::*anticonvulsive LY300164.
 +
 
 +
Where API manufacture on a site requires the observance of the rules of current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) or approval by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), process modifications can be only carried out fulfilling the required variation procedure. This represents a serious obstacle for the redesign of existing processes.
  
  
 
;Economics
 
;Economics
  
No further information submitted.
+
Cost benefits.
  
  
 
;Driving force for implementation
 
;Driving force for implementation
  
Economic and environmental reasons.
+
Cost benefits.
  
  
 
+
''3. Reactions in supercritical CO2''
'''3. Compounding extrusion'''
+
  
  
 
;Description
 
;Description
  
For compounding extrusion, the least energy is intended to be consumed. Therefore, online compounding is preferred over offline compounding because, in the case of offline extrusion, another melting of the product is required. The choice of offline compounding also relates to the requirements of the market.
+
Reactions can be carried out in supercritical CO2 (supercritical point at 73.8 bar/31°C) using a supercritical reactor system, as illustrated in the following figure for hydrogenations. Supercritical CO2 replaces the solvent and shows similar properties to n-hexane. The reaction is no longer mass transfer controlled and hydrogen shows infinite solubility. Reaction conditions such as pressure, temperature, residence time and hydrogen concentration can be manipulated independently. On completion, the CO2 is evaporated by reducing the pressure.
  
  
;Achieved environmental benefits
+
[[Image:A supercritical reactor system.jpg]]
 +
 
 +
Figure 4: A supercritical reactor system, BREF on Organic Fine Chemicals, Aug. 2006
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Achieved environmental benefits
 +
 
 +
::*low/no VOCs
 +
 
 +
::*less waste streams
 +
 
 +
::*higher selectivity
  
Reduction of energy consumption.
+
::*higher yields.  
  
  
 
;Cross-media effects
 
;Cross-media effects
  
No cross-media effects known.
+
None believed likely.
  
  
 
;Operational data
 
;Operational data
  
No further information submitted.
+
Above 73.8 bar/31 °C.
  
  
 
;Applicability
 
;Applicability
  
Generally applicable. Pelletisation of PVC is carried out after compounding, which is a downstream operation outside the scope of this document.
+
Some reaction types under development besides hydrogenation include:
 +
 
 +
::*alkylation
 +
 
 +
::*acid catalysed reactions/etherifications
 +
 
 +
::*hydroformylation.  
  
  
 
;Economics
 
;Economics
  
No further information submitted.
+
Reactions in supercritical CO2 represent cost-intensive processes, but the costs are justified by selectivity, reduction of energy use, saving of costs for product workup and solvent disposal.
  
  
;Driving force for implementation  
+
;Driving force for implementation
  
No further information submitted.
+
Selectivity through an inherently “tunable” system.
  
  
 +
''4. A “state of the art” multipurpose plant''
  
'''4. Re-use of waste'''
+
Multipurpose plants enable the operator to manufacture different products with a certain flexibility according to market requirements. Figure 5 gives an impression of the arrangement in a typical plant, which uses gravity flow for efficient material transport. The main components in the multipurpose plant are:
 +
 
 +
::* raw material storage (warehouse, tank farm)
 +
 
 +
::* reactors and vessels
 +
 
 +
::* finished and intermediate storage
 +
 
 +
::* utilities (e.g. cooling, vacuum, steam, cleaning)
 +
 
 +
::* process control systems
 +
 
 +
::* feed tanks (usually upper floors)
 +
 
 +
::* purification and separation equipment
 +
 
 +
::* recovery and abatement facilities
 +
 
 +
::* blow-off systems and catch tanks.
 +
 
 +
Production campaigns with batch wise, semi-batch or continuous operation of reactors and facilities for product work-up alternate with shutdown, cleaning and start-up situations.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Typical lay-out for a multipurpose plant.jpg]]
 +
 
 +
Figure 5: Typical lay-out for a multipurpose plant, BREF on Organic Fine Chemicals, Aug. 2006
 +
 
 +
 
 +
An example multi-purpose plant can have 22 different products/intermediate by utilizing 17 vessels in a production building. This picture could vary drastically over the year due to a possibly changed market situation. The use of the capacity varies from 60 to 95 %. Lower values would be critical from an economic point of view. Higher values would represent a real challenge from an operational point of view.
  
  
 
;Description
 
;Description
  
Appropriate process-integrated measures help to prevent or reduce the amount of waste from a polymer plant, which contains waste solvent, waste oil, polymer waxes and scrap, purification bed agents and catalyst residues. Waste solvent and oils can be used, where applicable, as cracker feedstock or as fuel. In some cases, concentrated polymer waxes can be sold as a by-product to the wax industry. Polymer scrap can be recycled. The usage of purification agents should be minimised through online regeneration and extended lifetime. Typically with the new generation of catalysts the efficiency is sufficiently high that catalyst residues can remain in the polymer, thus avoiding a catalyst wash step and the need to dispose of catalyst residues.
+
The new production site manufactures pharmaceuticals and performs reactions such as chiral synthesis, biocatalysis, Grignard reactions, Friedel-Crafts reactions, bromination, chlorination, aromatic substitutions, metal hydride reductions.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Major aspects have been considered as follows:
 +
 
 +
::* several techniques were considered to control VOC emissions, including: extra condensors, cryogenic condensation, scrubbing, thermal oxidation. The choice was made for thermal oxidation because all possible emissions on the site can be treated at once. Furthermore, the thermal oxidiser can be used as an energy provider for the plant  
 +
 
 +
::* the characteristic value for residue production is about 15 tonnes residue per tonne product. Products are made in quantities of up to 100 tonnes/year/product. Recycle loops are, in many cases, not possible due to quality and purity requirements. Only the solvents that are contaminated with, for example halogenated compounds or salts, are disposed of to a waste treatment plant
 +
 
 +
::* a survey is being carried out to make processes more selective and, therefore, produce less sludge at the WWTP, as the sludge has to be processed abroad
 +
 
 +
::* other measures to prevent residues include: using enzymes in the processes, performing reactions at lower temperatures, racemise after the reaction is completed
 +
 
 +
::* there is one process with runaway hazard. The temperature is measured in the reactor during start off to check if the reaction is running according to the instructions. The reaction is quenched if the temperature rises above the alarm setpoint.
 +
 
 +
The plant is designed in such a way that diffuse emissions are minimised and that the energy efficiency is optimised: On the top floor (5th floor), starting materials can be weighed and loaded in closed rooms. Products fall into the reactors that hang on the 3rd floor, using gravity instead of pumps and/or vacuum. This prevents uncontrolled emissions to a large extent, since pumps are an important source of uncontrolled emissions, and can save energy. On the 4th floor (thus between weighing and reactors) hang (double) condensors using thermal oil as the cooling medium. Solvents can either be returned to the reactors or run to a reception vessel. All systems are closed to prevent uncontrolled emissions. On the lower floors, products fall from the reactors into vessels where reception and drying functions are combined. Here again gravity does the work instead of pumps/vacuum. On each floor, pipes gather to a manifold. Apparatus can be connected to each other in different configurations using flexible pipes, depending on the process steps needed, thus preventing the use of building materials. Packings are replaced when a production campaign is finished (i.e. when a switch is made to the synthesis of a different product) to make sure the system remains safe and no uncontrolled emissions occur. When the configuration of the equipment is adapted to the new process, the packings are changed and the equipment is set under pressure in order to detect potential leaks. Inside the reactor during production, a light overpressure of nitrogen slightly decreases the evaporation of VOCs (blanketing). The building is closed and ventilated mechanically. The pressure inside the building is 10% higher than outside. The building is divided into fireproof compartments which are individually ventilated. All emitted gases from these compartments are either recycled, or after waste heat recovery, released to the air. All condensors and vents from sewage are connected to the thermal oxidiser to make sure all point emissions are treated. Waste water vents are also connected to the thermal oxidiser.
  
  
 
;Achieved environmental benefits
 
;Achieved environmental benefits
  
Minimisation of waste and energy recovery.
+
::* high energy efficiency
 +
 
 +
::* consequent minimisation of diffuse/fugitive emissions
 +
 
 +
::* extended recovery and abatement of VOC emissions.  
  
  
 
;Cross-media effects
 
;Cross-media effects
  
No further information submitted.
+
None believed likely.
  
  
 
;Operational data
 
;Operational data
  
No further information submitted.
+
No information provided.
  
  
 
;Applicability
 
;Applicability
  
Depending on the type of waste generated by the process. The Waste Incineration Directive sets requirements for incineration and monitoring, which could be difficult to meet in existing installation.
+
Generally applicable for new installations (including buildings). Technical restrictions may lead to individual solutions. For example the use of gravity flow is not applicable for high viscosity liquids. Alternatively to the use of gravity flow, canned pumps can be used to prevent fugitive emissions.
  
  
 
;Economics
 
;Economics
  
No further information submitted.
+
Cost benefits can be presumed through higher efficiency.
  
  
 
;Driving force for implementation
 
;Driving force for implementation
  
No further information submitted.
+
Cost and environmental benefits, and efficiency.
  
''Literature: BAT for Polymers, October 2006''
+
''Literature: BAT for the Manufacture of Organic Fine Chemicals, August 2006''  
  
 
   
 
   
  
 
Back to [[Subsection DG chemicals|EFFICIENCY FINDER FOR CHEMICAL INDUSTRY]]
 
Back to [[Subsection DG chemicals|EFFICIENCY FINDER FOR CHEMICAL INDUSTRY]]

Latest revision as of 16:20, 14 February 2013

Back to EFFICIENCY FINDER FOR CHEMICAL INDUSTRY


Process engineering and energy issues for the production of Organic fine chemicals


a) Reactors

The main equipment in multipurpose plants is the stirred tank reactor, which fulfils the flexibility requirements arising from the varied physical states of the materials being used (e.g. dry powders, wet solids, pastes, liquids, emulsions, gases). The vessels are required to withstand a range of process conditions (e. g. temperature, pressure, corrosion) and are thus usually made of stainless steel, rubber- or glass-lined steel, enamel coated, or other special materials. The mechanical design of the agitator baffles and cooling systems is constrained by the need to attach and maintain the rubber or glass lining.

Other characteristics:

  • used for both batch and continuous mode, as well as in cascades
  • sized up to 60 m3 (fermentation reactors up to about 1000 m3)
  • usually dished bottom (reactions may be carried out under pressure)
  • equipped with one or more stirrers to ensure the requested mixing degree, heat-exchange performance, etc.
  • jackets or half pipe coils are often fitted around the vessel to provide heat transfer
  • wall baffles are installed inside to prevent the gross rotation (“swirl”) of the contents with the stirrer.


Stirred tank reactor.jpg

Figure 2: Stirred tank reactor (conventional temperature control, left) and loop reactor (right), BREF on Organic Fine Chemicals, Aug. 2006


Other used reactor types are, e.g:

  • loop reactors (closed loop or continuous loop)
  • bubble columns (closed loop or continuous loop)
  • pipe reactors
  • tubular reactors.


b) Energy supply

Two main sources of energy are consumed on the typical site:

  • steam
  • electricity.

Generally, only steam is produced on-site and electricity is supplied by an external source. Cogeneration by self-production of electricity and steam is advantageous on large sites. Energy is normally provided by boilers equipped with turbines fitted with burners for natural gas and fuel oil, with gas being the main fuel (about 95%). Spent solvents are often used as a fuel together with gas. Figure 3 shows an example for a setup with two boilers sharing an exhaust gas recuperator. Here the smaller boiler (boiler 1 which produces 80 tonnes steam/hour) is mainly used in summer and the larger boiler (boiler 2 which produces 160 tonnes steam/hour) mainly in winter, when the steam demand is higher. The recuperator cools down the exhaust gas from 130°C to about 45°C and warms the water from 20°C to about 60°C. About 3.8 MW heat is recovered. Steam and electricity can also be provided by on-site combined cycle power plants, thermal oxidisers or incinerators.


Example of energy supply setup with two boilers.jpg

Figure 3: Example of energy supply setup with two boilers, BREF on Organic Fine Chemicals, Aug. 2006


c) Energy efficiency

1. Green chemistry:

Concerning the production of chemicals, the principle of green chemistry is to promote the use of alternative synthetic routes and alternative reaction conditions to existing less environmentally friendly processes; i.e. by minimising energy requirements, in recognition of the associated environmental and economic impacts. Reactions at ambient temperatures and pressures should be preferred


2. Enzymatic processes versus chemical processes


Description

Using enzymatic processes instead of chemical processes is advantageous from an environmental point of view. Less synthesis steps (no additional modification or protection of functional groups) and low solvent use are the major beneficial effects. Energy savings, fewer safety and disposal issues, and improved product quality also lead to cost benefits. The enzyme can be used in solution or fixed on a substrate, or as part of a polyfunctional enzymatic system, e.g. in living cells, free in a reaction medium or fixed on a substrate.


Achieved environmental benefits

An example from the manufacture of 6-aminopenicillanic acid is presented in the following table:


Table 1: Comparison of enzymatic and chemical processes. Consumption levels for the conversion of 1000 t Penicillin G, BREF on Organic Fine Chemicals, Aug. 2006


Comparison of enzymatic and chemical processes.jpg


Cross-media effects

Higher water consumption.


Operational data

No information provided.


Applicability

The technical feasibility has to be considered individually.


Other examples with environmental advantages are [46, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, 2003]:

  • Aspartame
  • 7-amino cefalosporanic acid
  • anticonvulsive LY300164.

Where API manufacture on a site requires the observance of the rules of current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) or approval by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), process modifications can be only carried out fulfilling the required variation procedure. This represents a serious obstacle for the redesign of existing processes.


Economics

Cost benefits.


Driving force for implementation

Cost benefits.


3. Reactions in supercritical CO2


Description

Reactions can be carried out in supercritical CO2 (supercritical point at 73.8 bar/31°C) using a supercritical reactor system, as illustrated in the following figure for hydrogenations. Supercritical CO2 replaces the solvent and shows similar properties to n-hexane. The reaction is no longer mass transfer controlled and hydrogen shows infinite solubility. Reaction conditions such as pressure, temperature, residence time and hydrogen concentration can be manipulated independently. On completion, the CO2 is evaporated by reducing the pressure.


A supercritical reactor system.jpg

Figure 4: A supercritical reactor system, BREF on Organic Fine Chemicals, Aug. 2006


Achieved environmental benefits

  • low/no VOCs
  • less waste streams
  • higher selectivity
  • higher yields.


Cross-media effects

None believed likely.


Operational data

Above 73.8 bar/31 °C.


Applicability

Some reaction types under development besides hydrogenation include:

  • alkylation
  • acid catalysed reactions/etherifications
  • hydroformylation.


Economics

Reactions in supercritical CO2 represent cost-intensive processes, but the costs are justified by selectivity, reduction of energy use, saving of costs for product workup and solvent disposal.


Driving force for implementation

Selectivity through an inherently “tunable” system.


4. A “state of the art” multipurpose plant

Multipurpose plants enable the operator to manufacture different products with a certain flexibility according to market requirements. Figure 5 gives an impression of the arrangement in a typical plant, which uses gravity flow for efficient material transport. The main components in the multipurpose plant are:

  • raw material storage (warehouse, tank farm)
  • reactors and vessels
  • finished and intermediate storage
  • utilities (e.g. cooling, vacuum, steam, cleaning)
  • process control systems
  • feed tanks (usually upper floors)
  • purification and separation equipment
  • recovery and abatement facilities
  • blow-off systems and catch tanks.

Production campaigns with batch wise, semi-batch or continuous operation of reactors and facilities for product work-up alternate with shutdown, cleaning and start-up situations.


Typical lay-out for a multipurpose plant.jpg

Figure 5: Typical lay-out for a multipurpose plant, BREF on Organic Fine Chemicals, Aug. 2006


An example multi-purpose plant can have 22 different products/intermediate by utilizing 17 vessels in a production building. This picture could vary drastically over the year due to a possibly changed market situation. The use of the capacity varies from 60 to 95 %. Lower values would be critical from an economic point of view. Higher values would represent a real challenge from an operational point of view.


Description

The new production site manufactures pharmaceuticals and performs reactions such as chiral synthesis, biocatalysis, Grignard reactions, Friedel-Crafts reactions, bromination, chlorination, aromatic substitutions, metal hydride reductions.


Major aspects have been considered as follows:

  • several techniques were considered to control VOC emissions, including: extra condensors, cryogenic condensation, scrubbing, thermal oxidation. The choice was made for thermal oxidation because all possible emissions on the site can be treated at once. Furthermore, the thermal oxidiser can be used as an energy provider for the plant
  • the characteristic value for residue production is about 15 tonnes residue per tonne product. Products are made in quantities of up to 100 tonnes/year/product. Recycle loops are, in many cases, not possible due to quality and purity requirements. Only the solvents that are contaminated with, for example halogenated compounds or salts, are disposed of to a waste treatment plant
  • a survey is being carried out to make processes more selective and, therefore, produce less sludge at the WWTP, as the sludge has to be processed abroad
  • other measures to prevent residues include: using enzymes in the processes, performing reactions at lower temperatures, racemise after the reaction is completed
  • there is one process with runaway hazard. The temperature is measured in the reactor during start off to check if the reaction is running according to the instructions. The reaction is quenched if the temperature rises above the alarm setpoint.

The plant is designed in such a way that diffuse emissions are minimised and that the energy efficiency is optimised: On the top floor (5th floor), starting materials can be weighed and loaded in closed rooms. Products fall into the reactors that hang on the 3rd floor, using gravity instead of pumps and/or vacuum. This prevents uncontrolled emissions to a large extent, since pumps are an important source of uncontrolled emissions, and can save energy. On the 4th floor (thus between weighing and reactors) hang (double) condensors using thermal oil as the cooling medium. Solvents can either be returned to the reactors or run to a reception vessel. All systems are closed to prevent uncontrolled emissions. On the lower floors, products fall from the reactors into vessels where reception and drying functions are combined. Here again gravity does the work instead of pumps/vacuum. On each floor, pipes gather to a manifold. Apparatus can be connected to each other in different configurations using flexible pipes, depending on the process steps needed, thus preventing the use of building materials. Packings are replaced when a production campaign is finished (i.e. when a switch is made to the synthesis of a different product) to make sure the system remains safe and no uncontrolled emissions occur. When the configuration of the equipment is adapted to the new process, the packings are changed and the equipment is set under pressure in order to detect potential leaks. Inside the reactor during production, a light overpressure of nitrogen slightly decreases the evaporation of VOCs (blanketing). The building is closed and ventilated mechanically. The pressure inside the building is 10% higher than outside. The building is divided into fireproof compartments which are individually ventilated. All emitted gases from these compartments are either recycled, or after waste heat recovery, released to the air. All condensors and vents from sewage are connected to the thermal oxidiser to make sure all point emissions are treated. Waste water vents are also connected to the thermal oxidiser.


Achieved environmental benefits
  • high energy efficiency
  • consequent minimisation of diffuse/fugitive emissions
  • extended recovery and abatement of VOC emissions.


Cross-media effects

None believed likely.


Operational data

No information provided.


Applicability

Generally applicable for new installations (including buildings). Technical restrictions may lead to individual solutions. For example the use of gravity flow is not applicable for high viscosity liquids. Alternatively to the use of gravity flow, canned pumps can be used to prevent fugitive emissions.


Economics

Cost benefits can be presumed through higher efficiency.


Driving force for implementation

Cost and environmental benefits, and efficiency.

Literature: BAT for the Manufacture of Organic Fine Chemicals, August 2006


Back to EFFICIENCY FINDER FOR CHEMICAL INDUSTRY